Re: Co jest nie tak z C++ (było: Rust) - Grupy dyskusyjne w eGospodarka.pl

eGospodarka.pl › Grupy › pl.comp.programming › Co jest nie tak z C++ (było: Rust) › Re: Co jest nie tak z C++ (było: Rust)

X-Received: by 10.31.171.78 with SMTP id u75mr12337vke.19.1504031195635; Tue, 29 Aug
2017 11:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.31.171.78 with SMTP id u75mr12337vke.19.1504031195635; Tue, 29 Aug
2017 11:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!agh.edu.pl!news.agh.edu.pl!news.cyf-kr.edu.pl!news.nask
.pl!news.nask.org.pl!news.unit0.net!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!pee
r01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!v29no1195322qtv.0!
news-out.google.com!j49ni1558qtc.1!nntp.google.com!u11no1193041qtu.1!postnews.g
oogle.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: pl.comp.programming
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a...@n...v.pl>
Complaints-To: g...@g...com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=159.205.151.11;
posting-account=xjvq9QoAAAATMPC2X3btlHd_LkaJo_rj
NNTP-Posting-Host: 159.205.151.11
References: <f...@g...com>
<1...@g...com>
<7...@g...com>
<b...@g...com>
<a...@n...v.pl>
<2...@g...com>
<a...@n...v.pl>
<on23a3$85s$1@node1.news.atman.pl>
<a...@n...v.pl>
<on75ke$g4u$1@node2.news.atman.pl>
<5...@g...com>
<onfotu$lh6$1@node1.news.atman.pl>
<0...@g...com>
<3...@g...com>
<6...@g...com>
<c...@g...com>
<d...@g...com>
<5...@g...com>
<c...@g...com>
<3...@g...com>
<6...@g...com>
<c...@g...com>
<6...@g...com>
<f...@g...com>
<0...@g...com>
<f...@g...com>
<d...@g...com>
<5...@g...com>
<a...@g...com>
<4...@g...com>
<8...@g...com>
<f...@g...com>
<a...@g...com>
<b...@g...com>
<a...@n...v.pl>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b...@g...com>
Subject: Re: Co jest nie tak z C++ (było: Rust)
From: "M.M." <m...@g...com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 18:26:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3782715354
X-Received-Bytes: 3508
Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.comp.programming:211389
[ ukryj nagłówki ]

On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 6:46:59 PM UTC+2, slawek wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:26:44 -0700 (PDT), g...@g...com
> I tu jest cały myk: czy Haskell domyśli się że jest O(N**2) czy
> będzie forsowała O(N**3), a może cudownie zejdzie po analizie reszty
> kodu do O(1) dzięki lazy evaluation?

Dobre pytanie.
Pozdrawiam