eGospodarka.pl
eGospodarka.pl poleca

eGospodarka.plGrupypl.internet.polipjakiś fuckup cdp/atm - tpsa ? › Re: jakiś fuckup cdp/atm - tpsa ?
  • Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!opal.futuro.pl!not-for-mail
    From: "GRUPPY" <...@e...pl>
    Newsgroups: pl.internet.polip
    Subject: Re: jakiś fuckup cdp/atm - tpsa ?
    Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:14:28 +0200
    Organization: Pro Futuro
    Lines: 151
    Message-ID: <f9pi47$bv4$1@opal.futuro.pl>
    References: <f9pdbg$9ub$1@inews.gazeta.pl>
    NNTP-Posting-Host: knulnia.etop.pl
    X-Trace: opal.futuro.pl 1187007431 12260 80.72.32.13 (13 Aug 2007 12:17:11 GMT)
    X-Complaints-To: u...@f...pl
    NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:17:11 +0000 (UTC)
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
    X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
    Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.internet.polip:82562
    [ ukryj nagłówki ]


    Użytkownik "Marek Burzyński" <m...@c...pl> napisał w wiadomości
    news:f9pdbg$9ub$1@inews.gazeta.pl...
    > [marek@Router_new] tool> traceroute
    > address: lg.atman.pl
    > ADDRESS STATUS
    > 1 80.50.236.117 617ms 307ms timeout
    > 2 195.117.0.214 72ms 13ms 13ms
    > 3 195.116.0.126 13ms 22ms 14ms
    > 4 217.17.32.2 14ms 13ms 13ms
    > 5 217.17.34.82 13ms 13ms 14ms
    >
    > z kolei w druga stronę:
    >
    > Router: Business.Internet
    >
    >
    > traceroute to 80.50.236.118 (80.50.236.118), 10 hops max, 40 byte packets
    > 1 r3.isp-r2.isp.atman.pl (85.232.232.254) 1.042 ms 0.733 ms 0.825 ms
    > 2 z-atman.tpnet.pl (195.116.0.125) 3.892 ms 78.931 ms 1.095 ms
    > 3 195.117.0.190 (195.117.0.190) 339.881 ms 239.864 ms *
    > 4 * * *
    > 5 * * *
    > 6 * * *
    >
    > [marek@Router_new] tool> traceroute 89.171.78.202
    > ADDRESS STATUS
    > 1 80.50.236.117 timeout 255ms timeout
    > 2 195.205.0.42 14ms 13ms 13ms
    > 3 80.50.236.174 204ms 211ms 211ms
    > 4 62.111.222.242 264ms 205ms timeout
    > 5 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 6 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 7 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 8 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 9 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 10 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 11 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 12 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 13 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 14 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 15 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 16 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 17 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 18 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 19 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 20 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 21 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 22 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 23 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 24 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 25 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 26 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 27 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 28 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 29 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 30 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > max-hops reached
    > [marek@Router_new] tool>
    >
    > i w drugą stronę:
    >
    >
    > C:\Documents and Settings\Marek>tracert 80.50.236.118
    >
    > Trasa śledzenia do 80.50.236.118 przewyższa maksymalną liczbę przeskoków
    > 30
    >
    > 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
    > 2 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms ip-89.171.78.201.crowley.pl
    > [89.171.78.201]
    > 3 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms jp1-2-r2-core.crowley.pl [62.111.222.241]
    > 4 198 ms 200 ms 310 ms z-crowley.tpnet.pl [80.50.236.173]
    > 5 * * * Upłynął limit czasu żądania.
    > 6 212 ms 215 ms * 80.50.236.118
    > 7 213 ms * 212 ms 80.50.236.118
    >
    > Śledzenie zakończone.
    >
    > C:\Documents and Settings\Marek>
    >
    > [marek@Router_new] tool> traceroute onet.pl
    > ADDRESS STATUS
    > 1 80.50.236.117 389ms 332ms 844ms
    > 2 195.117.0.206 20ms 17ms 19ms
    > 3 213.77.0.38 18ms 18ms 18ms
    > 4 213.180.143.34 21ms 20ms 18ms
    > 5 213.180.130.200 18ms 20ms 19ms
    >
    > [marek@Router_new] tool> traceroute pl-ix.pl
    > ADDRESS STATUS
    > 1 80.50.236.117 225ms 607ms 348ms network unreachable
    > 2 80.50.236.117 273ms 66ms 174ms network unreachable
    > 3 80.50.236.117 174ms 122ms 154ms network unreachable
    > 4 80.50.236.117 109ms 185ms 177ms network unreachable
    > 5 80.50.236.117 107ms 169ms timeout network unreachable
    > 6 80.50.236.117 timeout 69ms 124ms network unreachable
    > 7 80.50.236.117 233ms 108ms 138ms network unreachable
    > 8 80.50.236.117 172ms 139ms 734ms network unreachable
    > 9 80.50.236.117 191ms 114ms timeout network unreachable
    > 10 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 11 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 12 80.50.236.117 timeout timeout 135ms network unreachable
    > 13 80.50.236.117 114ms 112ms 68ms network unreachable
    > 14 80.50.236.117 172ms 128ms 156ms network unreachable
    > 15 80.50.236.117 138ms 103ms 173ms network unreachable
    > 16 80.50.236.117 765ms timeout timeout network unreachable
    > 17 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > 18 80.50.236.117 timeout timeout 185ms network unreachable
    > 19 80.50.236.117 117ms 91ms 527ms network unreachable
    > 20 80.50.236.117 496ms 317ms 69ms network unreachable
    > 21 80.50.236.117 113ms 113ms 117ms network unreachable
    > 22 80.50.236.117 120ms 115ms timeout network unreachable
    > 23 0.0.0.0 timeout timeout timeout
    > [marek@Router_new] tool>
    >
    >
    > to tylko u mnie ?
    >
    >
    > --
    > Marek Burzyński
    > www.cyberbajt.pl | www.cyberbajt.com



    z lg.tpnet.pl to wyglada dziwnie :

    raz tak

    1 z-ar2-do-szcz.srd2.tpnet.pl (80.50.231.205) 12 msec 48 msec 72 msec
    2 do-war-r3-war-ar1.tpnet.pl (195.205.0.214) 12 msec 16 msec 12 msec
    3 r3.isp-r2.isp.atman.pl (85.232.232.254) [AS 15694] 12 msec 12 msec 12
    msec

    a chwile potem tak

    1 z-ar2-do-szcz.srd2.tpnet.pl (80.50.231.205) 12 msec 12 msec 12 msec
    2 do-atman-war-ar1.tpnet.pl (195.117.0.30) 12 msec
    do-war-ar1-z-war-r4.war-ar1.tpnet.pl (195.117.0.214) 12 msec
    do-war-r3-war-ar1.tpnet.pl (195.205.0.214) 12 msec
    3 r3.isp-r2.isp.atman.pl (85.232.232.254) [AS 15694] 12 msec 12 msec 12
    msec


    Load-balancing jakis dziwaczny czy cus ?


    CSL


Podziel się

Poleć ten post znajomemu poleć

Wydrukuj ten post drukuj


Następne wpisy z tego wątku

Najnowsze wątki z tej grupy


Najnowsze wątki

Szukaj w grupach

Eksperci egospodarka.pl

1 1 1

Wpisz nazwę miasta, dla którego chcesz znaleźć jednostkę ZUS.

Wzory dokumentów

Bezpłatne wzory dokumentów i formularzy.
Wyszukaj i pobierz za darmo: