Re: Błędny epsilon - this is not a bug, this is ? - Grupy dyskusyjne w eGospodarka.pl

eGospodarka.pl › Grupy › pl.comp.programming › Błędny epsilon - this is not a bug, this is ? › Re: Błędny epsilon - this is not a bug, this is ?

Received: by 10.49.51.42 with SMTP id h10mr794946qeo.42.1353054110171; Fri, 16 Nov
2012 00:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.51.42 with SMTP id h10mr794946qeo.42.1353054110171; Fri, 16 Nov
2012 00:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!agh.edu.pl!news.agh.edu.pl!newsfeed2.atman.pl!newsfeed.
atman.pl!news.supermedia.pl!news.nask.pl!news.nask.org.pl!news.unit0.net!news.g
lorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit4.readnews.com!209.85.216.88.MISMATCH!u2n
o920063qal.0!news-out.google.com!gf5ni327qab.0!nntp.google.com!u2no920056qal.0!
postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: pl.comp.programming
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:21:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4...@g...com>
Complaints-To: g...@g...com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=79.162.71.175;
posting-account=Sb6m8goAAABbWsBL7gouk3bfLsuxwMgN
NNTP-Posting-Host: 79.162.71.175
References: <50924bb1$0$1308$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<k72sqt$gq$1@news.dialog.net.pl>
<509505f2$0$1317$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<k734vm$43g$1@news.dialog.net.pl>
<509533d1$0$26687$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<k797v2$t98$1@news.dialog.net.pl>
<509848c6$0$1208$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<k79hhh$26k$1@news.dialog.net.pl> <k7am9f$n0p$1@zeus.man.szczecin.pl>
<k7apte$eiu$1@news.task.gda.pl>
<0...@g...com>
<k7b4tp$9ke$1@news.task.gda.pl>
<50996da8$0$1216$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<k7buma$f2q$1@news.task.gda.pl>
<c...@g...com>
<50999f8a$0$1306$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<4...@g...com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0...@g...com>
Subject: Re: Błędny epsilon - this is not a bug, this is ?
From: kenobi <p...@g...com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:21:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.comp.programming:200977
[ ukryj nagłówki ]
>
> problemem jest raczej po prostu samo "f=0.1;" (a nie
>
> porównanie f!=1.0) IMO na "f=0.1;" powinien raczej
>
> lecieć nawet bład kompilacji

mozna by tez wprowadzic cos w rodzaju operatora
rzutowania dla przyblizen

float f = (approximation) 0.1;

tak by bez tego sie nie kompilowalo

(wogole uogolnienie tej sklasni od operatorow
rzutowania na wszelkie operatory np

float3 z = x (cross) y;

tez jest w sumie chyba dobrym pomyslem