Dnia Sat, 16 Mar 2019 06:43:56 -0700 (PDT), Zenek Kapelinder
napisał(a):
> Ta sama wikipedia. Cytuje "Jak zauważył James Lovelock, tsunami,
> które spowodowało awarię w Fukushimie zabiło 26 tys. osób, podczas
> gdy w wyniku awarii elektrowni nie zginęła ani jedna. Zapytaj u
> zrodla bo ktoras wikipedia mija sie z prawda. Jak widzisz starszy
> pan nie mija sie z prawda.


Ale masz jeszcze
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nucl
ear_disaster

"A survey computed that of some 300,000 evacuees, approximately 1,600
deaths related to the evacuation conditions, such as living in
temporary housing and hospital closures that had occurred as of August
2013, a number comparable to the 1,599 deaths directly caused by the
earthquake and tsunami in the Prefecture. The exact causes of these
evacuation related deaths were not specified, because according to the
municipalities, that would hinder relatives applying for
compensation.[18][274]

In a 2017 risk analysis, relying on the metric of potential months of
life lost, it determined that unlike Chernobyl, "relocation was
unjustified for the 160,000 people relocated after Fukushima"
especially considering 1,600 deaths occurred due to the stressful
evacuation conditions, when the potential future deaths from exposure
to radiation around Fukushima, would have been much less, if the
alternative of the shelter in place protocol had instead been
deployed"

Tylko ten teren jeszcze kilkadziesiat lat bedzie skazony.

J.