A.L. <l...@a...com> napisał(a):

> Poniewaz watek "Carnegie Mellon..." zrobil sie za duzy, zaczynam nowy.
>
> Regomenduje ciekawy artykul
>
> http://www.winestockwebdesign.com/Essays/Lisp_Curse.
html
>
> Now make this thought experiment interesting: Imagine adding object
> orientation to the C and Scheme programming languages. Making Scheme
> object-oriented is a sophomore homework assignment. On the other hand,
> adding object orientation to C requires the programming chops of
> Bjarne Stroustrup.

No tak, autor pomija fakt ze Stroustroup dodal obiektowosc do C w sposob ktory
zachowal wydajnosc C i pozwala operowac na zarowno niskim, jak i wysokim
poziomie abstrakcji.

>
> The consequences of this divergence in needed talent and effort cause
> The Lisp Curse:
>
> Lisp is so powerful that problems which are technical issues in other
> programming languages are social issues in Lisp.


Mi sie z kolei podoba ten watek na comp.lang.list, w ktorym BBMs postanowili
zwalczyc Lisp Curse i napisac klon reddit w Lisp:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse
_frm/thread/f560fdfb211aa8cb/c0159fbbc6496def

Zaczyna sie ambitnie:

"So let's rewrite a better one. By better one I mean adding new
functionalities like categories and/or comments on links for instance.

Let's set the rules:

Rule 1: Anything is OK as long as it's in Common Lisp. "

ale potem troche juz mniej:

"Rule 2: An exception to rule 1 is accepted for stuff like the OS(Linux,
MacOS, etc.), Database (PostgreSQL, MySQL), Webservers (Apache), etc. "

Czyli Common Lisp, chyba ze trzeba zrobic cos w swiecie rzeczywistym, jak, bo
ja wiem, zapisac cos w bazie danych albo wygenerowac strone WWW.

KK

--
Wysłano z serwisu Usenet w portalu Gazeta.pl -> http://www.gazeta.pl/usenet/