Re: Co jest nie tak z C++ (było: Rust) - Grupy dyskusyjne w eGospodarka.pl

eGospodarka.pl › Grupy › pl.comp.programming › Co jest nie tak z C++ (było: Rust) › Re: Co jest nie tak z C++ (było: Rust)

X-Received: by 10.31.171.78 with SMTP id u75mr25738vke.19.1504124116519; Wed, 30 Aug
2017 13:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.31.171.78 with SMTP id u75mr25738vke.19.1504124116519; Wed, 30 Aug
2017 13:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.icm.edu.pl!news.nask.pl!news.nask.org.pl!news.unit
0.net!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-medi
a.com!news.highwinds-media.com!v20no202442qtg.0!news-out.google.com!a26ni32qta.
0!nntp.google.com!u11no1816042qtu.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googl
egroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: pl.comp.programming
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a...@n...v.pl>
Complaints-To: g...@g...com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=37.47.141.133;
posting-account=VFwkXwoAAADdT4-lLKRZrMYkTjizGoyn
NNTP-Posting-Host: 37.47.141.133
References: <f...@g...com>
<c...@g...com>
<6...@g...com>
<f...@g...com>
<0...@g...com>
<f...@g...com>
<d...@g...com>
<5...@g...com>
<a...@g...com>
<4...@g...com>
<8...@g...com>
<onrgrg$7c5$1@node1.news.atman.pl>
<3...@g...com>
<onrrhk$hnr$1@node1.news.atman.pl>
<7...@g...com>
<ontnlk$h5t$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<b...@g...com>
<oo4qu3$b9c$1@node1.news.atman.pl>
<1...@g...com>
<oo6rhe$737$1@node2.news.atman.pl>
<a...@g...com>
<a...@n...v.pl>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b...@g...com>
Subject: Re: Co jest nie tak z C++ (było: Rust)
From: Wojciech Muła <w...@g...com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 20:15:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3496323189
X-Received-Bytes: 2999
Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.comp.programming:211438
[ ukryj nagłówki ]
On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 10:00:02 PM UTC+2, slawek wrote:
> Queszczyn: czy Toyota trzymała się MISRA? Przypominam, trzy ofiary
> śmiertelne z powodu softu.
>
> Czyli albo nie używali MISRA. Dlaczego?

Nie trzymali się, tylko deklarowali. Tu krótka prezentacja:
http://www.safetyresearch.net/Library/BarrSlides_FIN
AL_SCRUBBED.pdf

"From 2002-2004, Toyota said in public they followed MISRA-C
* But NASA reported > 7,000 violations of some of the rules (p. 29)
* I checked the full set and found > 80,000 in violations in 2005 Camry L4"

w.