On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:51:32 +0100, Andrzej Jarzabek
<a...@g...com> wrote:

>On 24/05/2011 21:41, A.L. wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 May 2011 16:47:05 +0200, Szyk<s...@o...pl> wrote:
>>
>> Aczkolwiek z niechecia proponuje Wikipedie, to artykul o Objective-C
>> jest rzetelny. W szczegolnosci polecam paragraf
>>
>> Philosophical differences between Objective-C and C++
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objective-C
>
>No i proszę bardzo, znajdzie tam również kolega odpowiedzi na swoje
>pytania. O Smalltalk:
>"Objective-C derives its object syntax from Smalltalk."
>"The Objective-C model of object-oriented programming is based on
>message passing to object instances. [...] In Smalltalk and Objective-C,
>the target of a message is resolved at runtime, with the receiving
>object itself interpreting the message."
>O dynamiźmie:
>"Objective-C, like Smalltalk, can use dynamic typing [...]"
>"The use of reflection is part of the wider distinction between dynamic
>(run-time) features versus static (compile-time) features of a language.
>Although Objective-C and C++ each employ a mix of both features,
>Objective-C is decidedly geared toward run-time decisions while C++ is
>geared toward compile-time decisions."

No dobrze, ale co ma to wspolnego z MODELEM OBIEKTOWOSCI?...

A.L.