Re: Telenet - gorzej od tpsa - Grupy dyskusyjne w eGospodarka.pl

eGospodarka.pl › Grupy › pl.internet.polip › Telenet - gorzej od tpsa › Re: Telenet - gorzej od tpsa

Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news2.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!newsfeed.gazeta
.pl!news.gazeta.pl!not-for-mail
From: RafiK <r...@R...goldenlan.net>
Newsgroups: pl.internet.polip
Subject: Re: Telenet - gorzej od tpsa
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:16:11 +0100
Organization: ASK GoldenLAN www.goldenlan.net
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <c3p9q8$bsj$1@inews.gazeta.pl>
References: <c370t5$5ub$1@inews.gazeta.pl> <c3no87$oae$1@inews.gazeta.pl>
<c3ojv7$322$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <c3op53$44v$1@inews.gazeta.pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: brzesko-217.75.57.22.brzesko57.ptc.pl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: inews.gazeta.pl 1080044169 12179 217.75.57.22 (23 Mar 2004 12:16:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: u...@a...pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:16:09 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <c3op53$44v$1@inews.gazeta.pl>
X-Accept-Language: en,pl
X-User: zlota315
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; PL; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.internet.polip:64019
[ ukryj nagłówki ]
Użytkownik ajax napisał:
> rg wrote:
>
> jeśli 6000 ping jest normalny w tej sieci to chyba jednak zamówię neo

Jak już było w tym wątku, nie w każdej spółce TeleNetu jest tak źle. Ja
na zwykłym modemie 56 kb (Telefony Brzeskie) mam:

PING onet.pl (213.180.130.200): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=0 ttl=56 time=116.0 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=130.2 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=120.2 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=120.2 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=120.1 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=120.2 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=120.2 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=130.2 ms

--- onet.pl ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 116.0/122.1/130.2 ms

PING www.wp.pl (212.77.100.101): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=0 ttl=119 time=130.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=150.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=2 ttl=119 time=130.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=3 ttl=119 time=130.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=4 ttl=119 time=161.9 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=5 ttl=119 time=130.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=6 ttl=119 time=130.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=7 ttl=119 time=150.1 ms

--- www.wp.pl ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 130.2/139.1/161.9 ms

--
RafiK