Re: Ping do WP - Grupy dyskusyjne w eGospodarka.pl

eGospodarka.pl › Grupy › pl.internet.polip › Ping do WP › Re: Ping do WP

Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.gazeta.pl!newsfeed.pionier.net.pl!news.man.lodz.pl
!not-for-mail
From: Łukasz <l...@w...pl>
Newsgroups: pl.internet.polip
Subject: Re: Ping do WP
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:12:26 +0100
Organization: LODMAN Usenet Server
Lines: 76
Message-ID: <m...@m...lodz.pl>
References: <8...@w...net> <hcngi7$kcv$1@news.task.gda.pl>
Reply-To: Lista dyskusyjna poświęcona sprawom Internetu, w szczególności
polskiego. <p...@m...lodz.pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kujawiak.man.lodz.pl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: newsfeed1.man.lodz.pl 1257196370 8171 212.51.192.18 (2 Nov 2009 21:12:50
GMT)
X-Complaints-To: a...@m...lodz.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:12:50 +0000 (UTC)
To: p...@m...lodz.pl
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
In-Reply-To: <hcngi7$kcv$1@news.task.gda.pl>
X-LODMAN-MailScanner-Information: LODMAN - mail1.man.lodz.pl
X-LODMAN-MailScanner-ID: 1N54Ce-0005Td-Bv
X-LODMAN-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LODMAN-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.673,
required 6, BAYES_00 -2.60, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
1.96, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB 0.62, SPF_FAIL 0.69)
X-LODMAN-MailScanner-From: l...@w...pl
X-LODMAN-MailScanner-To: p...@m...lodz.pl
X-LODMAN-MailScanner-Watermark: 1257801161.0376@yqORy6SNwtnQv5wvKWjIMA
X-Spam-Status: No
X-BeenThere: p...@m...lodz.pl
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lista dyskusyjna poświęcona sprawom Internetu, w szczególności
polskiego. <polip.man.lodz.pl>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.man.lodz.pl/mailman/listinfo/polip>,
<mailto:p...@m...lodz.pl?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.man.lodz.pl/pipermail/polip>
List-Post: <mailto:polip@man.lodz.pl>
List-Help: <mailto:p...@m...lodz.pl?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.man.lodz.pl/mailman/listinfo/polip>,
<mailto:p...@m...lodz.pl?subject=subscribe>
Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.internet.polip:90614
[ ukryj nagłówki ]

K pisze:
> Lukasz Olesiejuk pisze:
>
>> Witam,
>> Ktorys raz z kolei u nas sie to powtarza, macie to samo?
>>
>> Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
>> 1. 83.142.222.161 0.0% 3 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.1
>> 2. WP.plix.pl 0.0% 3 415.4 488.0 415.4 540.8 65.1
>> 3. do-r4.rtrd1.adm.wp-sa.pl 0.0% 3 425.0 420.7 413.7 425.0 6.2
>> 4. www.wp.pl 0.0% 3 424.6 421.7 418.8 424.6 4.1
>>
>> Pozdrawiam,
>>
>
> najsmieszniejsze jest to, ze z atmana przez ac-x:
>
> HOST: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
> 2. wp.ac-x.pl 0.0% 10 349.8 337.6 324.2 349.8
> 9.3
> 3. do-r2.rtrd1.adm.wp-sa.pl 0.0% 10 331.7 336.6 329.5 352.3
> 6.9
> 4. www.wp.pl 10.0% 10 331.3 341.7 330.4 360.5
> 10.1
>
>
> przez netie via atman (ac-x):
>
> HOST: xx.xxx.xx.xx Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
> 2. StarH001RT01.inetia.pl 10.0% 10 2.9 6.6 2.6 37.1
> 11.4
> 3. StarH001RT03-StarH001RT06.in 0.0% 10 4.2 7.5 3.8 36.6
> 10.2
> 4. StarH001rt06-ToruH001rt05.in 0.0% 10 13.5 14.2 12.5 15.5
> 1.0
> 5. ToruH001rt05-WarsC001rt06.in 0.0% 10 11.0 11.1 10.6 11.7
> 0.4
> 6. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
> 0.0
> 7. WarsH002RT22-WarsB010RT06.in 0.0% 10 15.3 15.0 12.6 16.4
> 1.2
> 8. m320-pl-4-1-0-800.atman.pl 0.0% 10 10.9 11.7 10.7 13.8
> 1.0
> 9. wp.ac-x.pl 0.0% 10 12.0 53.7 11.2 160.1
> 60.8
> 10. do-r2.rtrd1.adm.wp-sa.pl 0.0% 10 12.6 11.9 11.1 12.6
> 0.4
> 11. www.wp.pl 0.0% 10 11.7 12.4 11.6 13.7
> 0.6
>
> z tasku:
>
> HOST: xx.xx.xx Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
> 2. area1-jra.10ge.task.gda.pl 0.0% 10 0.9 1.0 0.7 1.3
> 0.2
> 3. wp-jra.task.gda.pl 0.0% 10 0.8 1.0 0.7 1.4
> 0.2
> 4. do-r2.rtrd1.adm.wp-sa.pl 0.0% 10 1.1 1.1 0.8 1.3
> 0.2
> 5. www.wp.pl 0.0% 10 1.2 1.4 1.0 2.0
> 0.3
>
>

via TKT

ADDRESS STATUS
1 82-160-115-129.tktelekom.pl 1ms 1ms 1ms
2 pkp-jra.10ge.task.gda.pl 5ms 6ms 5ms
3 wp-jra.task.gda.pl 6ms 6ms 6ms
4 do-r2.rtrd1.adm.wp-sa.pl 5ms 6ms 6ms
5 www.wp.pl 6ms 6ms 6ms

Lukas